Industry, platform, spend range, and constraints are preserved without exposing private data.
Each case study is anonymized where needed, but keeps the useful parts intact: the account problem, what I changed, why it mattered, and the result over a defined window.
Industry, platform, spend range, and constraints are preserved without exposing private data.
The focus is on diagnosis, account changes, feed fixes, and decision quality.
Results are framed with the measurement caveats a marketing team would care about.
Challenge
The account had overlapping Shopping and PMax coverage, weak branded demand separation, and inflated ROAS caused by brand-heavy traffic being absorbed into the wrong campaign types.
What changed
Outcome | 90 days
Blended ROAS improved from 3.1 to 4.6 over 90 days. Non-brand efficiency stabilized, waste dropped, and performance became easier to trust week to week.
Detail
Read full case studyChallenge
The account had hundreds of disapproved products, no useful PMax segmentation, and three declining months of performance with no clear explanation from prior management.
What changed
Outcome | 60 days
Critical disapprovals were cleared within three weeks, PMax revenue rose 38% inside 60 days, and the account moved from reactive troubleshooting to structured optimization.
Detail
Read full case studyChallenge
High CPCs, weak match-type discipline, and no meaningful negative-keyword process had pushed non-brand campaigns into an expensive pattern of low-intent traffic.
What changed
Outcome | 45 days
Non-brand CPC dropped 22% over 45 days, conversion rate improved, and the account became much easier to scale without paying for noise.
Detail
Read full case studySend your platform, spend range, and current campaign mix. I'll tell you quickly if the account looks like a good fit for working together.